Performance fountain is a form of our fountain, which can show a magical scene through design, technology, light and water mist.It always very interesting.Our team has creative design, rich work experience and cost-effective solutions.We are very willing to provide our professional services to any friends in need.
Performance Fountain,Fountain Musical,Fountain Dancing,Water Fountain Dance Wuxi Jinshanghua Environmental Equipment Co., Ltd , https://www.jshfountain.com
The United States has finally concluded its "double anti-dumping" investigation into Chinese photovoltaic (PV) products, with the U.S. Department of Commerce releasing the final decision yesterday. The ruling imposed anti-dumping duties ranging from 18.32% to 249.96%, and countervailing duties between 14.78% and 15.97% on Chinese crystalline silicon PV cells, modules, laminates, panels, and building-integrated materials. This punitive tariff has sparked strong reactions from China's PV industry, which is already facing significant challenges.
According to U.S. trade procedures, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is expected to issue a final ruling on November 23. With the U.S. approaching a critical election period, trade protectionism has become a key political tool, making the ITC’s decision highly uncertain. Industry experts are concerned that if the European Union follows a similar path and imposes comparable tariffs, it could severely impact China’s already struggling solar sector.
On October 11, Shen Danyang, a spokesperson for China’s Ministry of Commerce, criticized the U.S. for escalating trade tensions in the clean energy sector, calling it a dangerous signal of protectionism that hinders global renewable energy development.
Among leading companies, Suntech Power was hit hardest, with an anti-dumping duty rate of 31.73% and a countervailing duty of 14.78%, bringing the total to nearly 47%. Trina Solar had the lowest combined tax rate at 23.75%, while other major players like Yingli Solar faced rates around 30.66%. Meanwhile, many smaller manufacturers could face up to 250% tariffs, which would make them uncompetitive in the U.S. market.
Analysts warn that any tariff above 20% would significantly erode the price advantage of Chinese PV products, while those facing over 250% tariffs would be effectively excluded from the U.S. market. For an industry with average gross profit margins of no more than 10%, these tariffs are not just unfair—they are devastating.
Suntech’s CEO, E. L. Mick McDaniel, called the ruling “unfair,†stating that trade barriers only weaken the competitiveness of solar energy compared to other power sources. He warned that such measures could lead to long-term harm for the entire solar industry.
Trina Solar’s CEO, Gao Ji, expressed disappointment but emphasized the company’s commitment to comply with U.S. regulations while reserving the right to appeal the decision. The Ministry of Commerce also voiced strong opposition, urging the U.S. to reconsider its approach, as it harms both American consumers and domestic suppliers.
With the EU currently conducting its own double anti-dumping and countervailing investigations, the situation remains tense. The EU has already launched an anti-dumping probe against Chinese PV firms and is preparing to file a countervailing lawsuit. As the U.S. case sets a precedent, the global outlook for China’s solar industry looks increasingly bleak.
Industry leaders are now pushing for strategic adjustments, including expanding the domestic market and exploring overseas production to bypass trade barriers. As one expert put it, the time has come for the Chinese PV sector to rethink its reliance on foreign markets and build resilience against growing international protectionism.